(Not a gateway drug) |
(Not madness.) |
My point is that none of them really served as a "gateway" to the other. Each had their own effect, some of which I liked more than others, but could take or leave. Cocaine never took hold with me -- it just made me twitchy and too chatty. I liked pot for certain things and in certain situations, but it never became problematic the way alcohol did. I never wanted to toke up before work or on my lunch hour, for example, and it never made me pick fights with strangers.
Which brings me to the brave new world of "exit drugs." Here is none other than Dr. Oz yesterday, explaining how reefer madness might just save us all from the opioid epidemic. (And yes, I did just link to High Times.)
(Not a doctor.) |
Look I'm no doctor, I just play one on the internet. But you'll forgive me if I remain a tad skeptical. My drug of choice, my addiction, was always (and remained for 30 years) simple booze. If the occasional bong-hit didn't lead me to powerballing heroin and morphine back in the day, then I'm a little skeptical that bogarting a doobie now will do much to stop an Oxy jones.
If we want to talk about which is safer* overall, fine. But could we stop talking about drugs as if their effects are interchangeable or that abuse of one leads inexorably to abuse of them all? Or the reverse, that substituting one for another will somehow solve one's addiction to a specific thing? Or one's general desire to be altered? Because in my experience neither has proven true, just sayin.
*Clue: It's pot.
No comments:
Post a Comment